‘Apart from the detour to Bethel, the journey therefore focuses on places connected with Israel’s entry into the promised land. The purpose of this, or at least of the writer’s account of it, is to draw attention to the special roles of Elijah and Elisha in Israel’s history. Previous events in Elijah’s life recalled aspects of Moses’ ministry, e.g. like Moses, Elijah received a revelation of God on Mt Horeb, and his slaughter of the prophets of Baal had echoes of the aftermath of the golden calf incident (Ex. 32:25–29). Now he crossed to the eastern side of the Jordan (in a manner similar to the crossing of the Red Sea under Moses’ leadership), where Moses’ ministry also came to an end. Indeed, the end of Moses’ life was almost as mysterious as that of Elijah’s (Dt. 34:6). The parallels between the lives of the two men are underlined in the NT when they both appear speaking to Jesus at his transfiguration (Mt. 17:3).’ (NBC)
‘If Elijah is identified as a second Moses, Elisha would appear to be in the mould of Joshua. As Joshua succeeded Moses as leader of the people, so Elisha succeeded Elijah, crossing the Jordan on dry land from east to west as Joshua did (14) and following in Joshua’s footsteps by going on to Jericho (15–22). (Even Elisha’s name recalls that of Joshua. Elisha means ‘God is salvation’, while Joshua means ‘Yahweh is salvation’.)’ (NBC)
In what ways does God demonstrate his approval of Elisha’s ministry in this chapter? In what ways do you expect to know God’s approval in your own life?
There are several incidents in this chapter in which people are shown that God’s power is with Elisha, just as it had been with Elijah. The most difficult of these is the one recorded in verses 23-24. With regard to this incident: (a) what does it tell us about God’s character? (b) would you say that it was typical or exceptional for a prophet to call down a curse in this way? (c) what does the New Testament say about this (see, for example, Luke 9:54f; Romans 12:19-21)? (d) do you agree that ultimately everyone will have to face the consequences of their loose words and false deeds (see, for example, Matthew 12:36)?
Elijah Makes a Swift Departure, 1-18
2:1 Just before the LORD took Elijah up to heaven in a windstorm, Elijah and Elisha were traveling from Gilgal. 2:2 Elijah told Elisha, “Stay here, for the LORD has sent me to Bethel.” But Elisha said, “As certainly as the LORD lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they went down to Bethel. 2:3 Some members of the prophetic guild in Bethel came out to Elisha and said, “Do you know that today the LORD is going to take your master from you?” He answered, “Yes, I know. Be quiet.”
‘In the close of the foregoing chapter we had a wicked king leaving the world in disgrace, here we have a holy prophet leaving it in honour; the departure of the former was his greatest misery, of the latter his greatest bliss: men are as their end is.’ (MHC)
The Lord was about to take Elijah up to heaven in a whirlwind – As with Enoch, so to Elijah was given the honour of being translated, body and soul, to heaven, without seeing death. This is an anticipation of what will happen to those believers who are still alive when our Lord returns.
‘It is not for us to say why God would put such a peculiar honour upon Elijah above any other of the prophets; he was a man subject to like passions as we are, knew sin, and yet never tasted death. Wherefore is he thus dignified, thus distinguished, as a man whom the Kings of kings did delight to honour? We may suppose that herein, 1. God looked back upon his past services, which were eminent and extraordinary, and intended a recompence for those and an encouragement to the sons of the prophets to tread in the steps of his zeal and faithfulness, and, whatever it cost them, to witness against the corruptions of the age they lived in. 2. He looked down upon the present dark and degenerate state of the church, and would thus give a very sensible proof of another life after this, and draw the hearts of the faithful few upward towards himself, and that other life. 3. He looked forward to the evangelical dispensation, and, in the translation of Elijah, gave a type and figure of the ascension of Christ and the opening of the kingdom of heaven to all believers. Elijah had, by faith and prayer, conversed much with heaven, and now he is taken thither, to assure us that if we have our conversation in heaven, while we are here on earth, we shall be there shortly, the soul shall (and that is the man) be happy there, there for ever.’ (MHC)
Gilgal – ‘The journey in this narrative took in places which were heavy with associations with Israel’s past. Gilgal (1) was the first stopping-place after the Israelites had crossed the Jordan. Male Israelites born during the wilderness years were circumcised there, and a Passover was celebrated (Jos. 5). Bethel (2), some 14 miles (24 km) into the central hills, was the place of Jacob’s encounter with God (Gn. 28). Jericho (4), in the Jordan valley not far from Gilgal, was the first town to fall to Joshua (Jos. 6), and the Jordan (6) had miraculously stopped to let Israel enter the land (Jos. 3).’ (NBC)
Three times (vv2, 4, 6) Elijah tried to make Elisha stay behind (why?); but Elisha insisted on going with him (again, why?).
2:4 Elijah said to him, “Elisha, stay here, for the LORD has sent me to Jericho.” But he replied, “As certainly as the LORD lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they went to Jericho. 2:5 Some members of the prophetic guild in Jericho approached Elisha and said, “Do you know that today the LORD is going to take your master from you?” He answered, “Yes, I know. Be quiet.”
‘Three times Elijah had tested his successor; thrice Elisha stood the test (cf. Mt 4:1–11; Lk 22:31–62; Jn 21:15–27).’ (EBC)
2:6 Elijah said to him, “Stay here, for the LORD has sent me to the Jordan.” But he replied, “As certainly as the LORD lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they traveled on together. 2:7 The fifty members of the prophetic guild went and stood opposite them at a distance, while Elijah and Elisha stood by the Jordan. 2:8 Elijah took his cloak, folded it up, and hit the water with it. The water divided, and the two of them crossed over on dry ground.
v8 ‘The fact that this group of prophets has seen this miracle becomes important later, for Elisha’s repetition of the act will confirm in their minds that Elisha is truly Elijah’s successor (cf. 2 Kgs 2:13–15).’ (NAC)
2:9 When they had crossed over, Elijah said to Elisha, “What can I do for you, before I am taken away from you?” Elisha answered, “May I receive a double portion of the prophetic spirit that energizes you.” 2:10 Elijah replied, “That’s a difficult request! If you see me taken from you, may it be so, but if you don’t, it will not happen.”
“Let me inherit a double portion of your spirit” – Elisha was not asking for twice as much power as Elijah had. Indeed, Elisha had no thought of being treated as Elijah’s equal. His desire was to be treated his firstborn son, and therefore his heir and successor, cf. Deut 21:17.
2:11 As they were walking along and talking, suddenly a fiery chariot pulled by fiery horses appeared. They went between Elijah and Elisha, and Elijah went up to heaven in a windstorm. 2:12 While Elisha was watching, he was crying out, “My father, my father! The chariot and horsemen of Israel!” Then he could no longer see him. He grabbed his clothes and tore them in two. 2:13 He picked up Elijah’s cloak, which had fallen off him, and went back and stood on the shore of the Jordan. 2:14 He took the cloak that had fallen off Elijah, hit the water with it, and said, “Where is the LORD, the God of Elijah?” When he hit the water, it divided and Elisha crossed over.
2:15 When the members of the prophetic guild in Jericho, who were standing at a distance, saw him do this, they said, “The spirit that energized Elijah rests upon Elisha.” They went to meet him and bowed down to the ground before him. 2:16 They said to him, “Look, there are fifty capable men with your servants. Let them go and look for your master, for the wind sent from the LORD may have carried him away and dropped him on one of the hills or in one of the valleys.” But Elisha replied, “Don’t send them out.” 2:17 But they were so insistent, he became embarrassed. So he said, “Send them out.” They sent the fifty men out and they looked for three days, but could not find Elijah. 2:18 When they came back, Elisha was staying in Jericho. He said to them, “Didn’t I tell you, ‘Don’t go’?”
A chariot of fire and horses of fire – ‘Just as fire from heaven once proved Yahweh is more powerful than Baal, so now a similar heavenly fire proves that Elijah is the prophet par excellence. And just as another fire from heaven protected him from wicked King Ahaziah (1 Kings 1:9–12), so now it removes Elijah permanently from any further dangers or discouragements.’ (NAC)
Elijah went up to heaven – The translation of Elijah, along with that of Enoch, is one of the pieces of evidence concerning belief the continued existence of the soul in OT times. See Gen. 5:24; Heb. 11:5; 2 Kings 2:11; 1 Sam. 28:7-20.
On the expectation of the return of Elijah:
‘In the fifth century bc, the prophet Malachi predicted that the return of Elijah would precede the ‘great and terrible day of the Lord’ (Mal. 4:5). In its context this indicates a prophet who would repeat Elijah’s ministry of calling the people back to God (Mal. 4:6), but it led to much speculation that Elijah would return in person (cf. Mt. 17:10; Mk. 8:28). Jesus indicated that the ministry of Elijah had been resumed by John the Baptist, fulfilling the words of Malachi (Mt. 11:14; 17:11–13).’ (NBC)
“The chariots and horsemen of Israel!” – ‘which probably means Elijah’s prophetic powers and spiritual depth are the nation’s true strength.’ (NAC)
“Where now is the Lord, the God of Elijah” – ‘the God who caused drought, brought fire from the sky, raised the dead, and took Elijah to heaven.’ (NAC)
In this incident, Elisha discovers that though Elijah is gone, Elijah’s God is not. (NAC)
‘When Elisha approached the Jordan and it divided for him as it had done for Elijah, the event confirmed that the spirit active in Elijah now rested on him. The prophets from Jericho therefore acknowledged him as their new master (15).’ (NBC)
‘A man of God whose mission on earth is finished ascends into heaven and leaves his spirit with his follower to continue that mission. The similarities to Christ’s ascension and pouring out his Spirit on his disciples at Pentecost are hard to miss.’ (Source)
Elisha Demonstrates His Authority, 19-25
2:19 The men of the city said to Elisha, “Look, the city has a good location, as our master can see. But the water is bad and the land doesn’t produce crops.” 2:20 Elisha said, “Get me a new jar and put some salt in it.” So they got it. 2:21 He went out to the spring and threw the salt in. Then he said, “This is what the LORD says, ‘I have purified this water. It will no longer cause death or fail to produce crops.” 2:22 The water has been pure to this very day, just as Elisha prophesied.
v22 ‘In this incident we may also see the curse which Joshua had pronounced on Jericho (Jos. 6:26) being revoked by the words of Elisha, the new Joshua.’ (NBC)
Miracles of Elisha
- Jordan divided 2 Ki 2:14
- Waters healed 2 Ki 2:21
- Mocking children torn by bears 2 Ki 2:24
- Water supplied 2 Ki 3:16
- Widow’s oil multiplied 2 Ki 4:5
- Pottage rendered harmless 2 Ki 4:41
- Loaves multiplied 2 Ki 4:43
- Child raised 2 Ki 4:35
- Naaman healed 2 Ki 5:10
- Gehazi struck with leprosy 2 Ki 5:27
- Iron caused to swim 2 Ki 6:6
- Syrians smitten 2 Ki 6:18
- Resurrection of a man 2 Ki 13:21
(Source unknown)
2:23 He went up from there to Bethel. As he was traveling up the road, some young boys came out of the city and made fun of him, saying, “Go on up, baldy! Go on up, baldy!” 2:24 When he turned around and saw them, he called God’s judgment down on them. Two female bears came out of the woods and ripped forty-two of the boys to pieces. 2:25 From there he traveled to Mount Carmel and then back to Samaria.
A third group of people now learn about Elisha’s power.
Scholars and ordinary Bible readers alike have puzzled over this account:
‘Some commentators think [it] was originally meant “to frighten the young into respect for their reverend elders,” while others believe the account is legendary and represents the worst notions of certain prophetic circles.’ (House)
‘The way many read this text, a mild personal offense by some innocent little children was turned into a federal case by a crotchety old prophet as short on hair as he was on humor. Put in its sharpest form, the complaint goes: How can I believe in a God who would send bears to devour little children for innocently teasing an old man whose appearance probably was unusual even for that day?’ (HSB)
Hobbs (WBC) considers that this story:
‘raises some serious questions which are not answered by the writer. The death of forty-two boys is hardly to be seen as a characteristic prophetic activity. Suffice it to say that, like the incident of Elijah and the soldiers of Ahaziah, this incident is characterized by excess. Like the touching of the Ark of the Covenant (2 Sam 6:6–7), the ridicule of sacred persons is rewarded by the harshest of punishments. The incident is reminiscent of 1 Kgs 13:20–24 and 20:35–36.’
Unfortunately, Hobbs offers no further help on this passage.
The law required that God’s prophets were to be taken seriously, Deut 18:19. To slight a prophet is to slight God and his word.
It is certainly wrong to see Elisha as an old man at this stage: he was probably around 25 years old age, for he lived another sixty years.
Bethel – Jeroboam had made this a place of idolatrous worship, 1 Kings 12:25-33. Elisha is walking into a stronghold of idolatry. We may see the present account as part of a large theme of a struggle between true and false worship, between God and Baal.
Young boys – “little children” (KJV), “boys” (NIV), “small boys” (ESV). The Hebrew phrase is a combination of the noun na‘ar and the adjective qatan.
It may well be significant that these ‘boys’ emerge from Bethel, having no doubt grown up in that idolatrous environment. Some scholars suggest that they may even have been assoiated with the apostate priesthood there.
Referring to the NIV 1984 translation of ‘youths’, Provan comments robustly:
‘The use of naʿar alone would allow the NIV’s translation (cf. the additional note to 1 Kgs. 20:14), but the appearance of qāṭān, “small, young,” precludes it. The NIV in fact translates naʿar qāṭān in 1 Kgs. 3:7 and 11:17 (correctly) as “little child” and “boy” respectively (cf. also naʹarâ qe ṭannâ, “young girl,” in 2 Kgs. 5:2). The translator has apparently had more difficulty than the authors here in coming to terms with the idea that young persons as well as old should be subject to divine judgment for their sins.’
The noun na‘ar is used of
- The baby Moses (Ex 2:6)
- Fully-grown Absalom (2 Sam 14:21).
- A servant (Gen 22:3)
- An armour-bearer (Judges 9:54)
- A king’s official (2 Kings 19:6)
- A priest (1 Sam 2:17).
The accompanying adjective qatan means small, little or young. It is used to describe:
- A rebel named Hadad the Edomite (1 Kings 11:17).
- Solomon, when he took the throne at about the age of twenty, (1 Kings 3:7).
The exact same expression is used in:
2 Kings 5:14 ‘So he went down and dipped in the Jordan seven times, as the prophet had instructed. His skin became as smooth as a young child’s and he was healed.’ (Emphasis added)
From this usage we may conclude that the individuals referred to here were somewhere between twelve and thirty years of age (House). It is possible that they were
‘forty-two priestly servants attached to that city’s idolatrous shrine. They mocked and ridiculed Elisha because he opposed everything they and their god stood for.’ (Chad Bird)
Olley notes:
‘Burnett, ‘ “Going Down” ’, pp. 295–26, cites texts which suggest ‘young men of the royal and perhaps priestly establishment at Bethel’”
“You baldhead” – Cf. Isa 3:17, 24. Actually, premature baldness was very rare in the ancient Near East, some scholars (including Goldingay, House) think that Elisha’s baldness was a prophetic tonsure. This would have made him immediately recognisable as a man of God. If so, then the insult was more against his prophetic office than his person.
On the other hand, this insult
‘may refer to some physical marking Elisha took on as a prophet rather than to a literal baldness. If this was the case, the insult was directed specifically at Elisha as a prophet and therefore at the Lord whom he represented.’ (NAC)
‘Earlier in the chapter, as Elijah and Elisha travel together, the sons of the prophets repeatedly say to Elisha, “Do you know that today the Lord will take away your master from over you?” 2 Kgs 2:3, 5 — or more literally, “from over your head [רֹאשׁ].” In other words, by taking Elijah, the Lord was taking Elisha’s head, i.e., his leader, authority, and mentor. When God takes Elijah up in the whirlwind, God takes Elisha’s “head,” leaving him, in this sense, “bald.” Thus, when these youths shout “Go up, baldhead,” they may be taunting Elisha with the fact that his mentor has been taken away, leaving him by himself.’
“Go on up!” – Probably not a reference to Elisha’s journey ‘up’ to Bethel (contra Goldingay), but to Elija’s translation to heaven (2 Kings 2; the same word is used for both). The youths are saying, in effect, “Get lost! Blast off just as Elijah has done! We’re fed up with both of you!” Thus, the youth’s insults were directed, not just at Elisha the prophet, but at the God on whose behalf he spoke. Their attitude was representative of their society, which increasingly was turning against the word of God and was inviting upon itself judgement more severe than the one that is here recorded.
The taunt should, therefore, not be regarded as a comment on Elisha’s physical appearance, but rather as a rejection of him as a prophet. The judgment is, therefore, confirmation that Elijah’s mantle has indeed passed to Elisha.
Here is a literal fulfilment of the covenant curse enunciated in Lev 26:22.
This should be seen also as a warning of worse things to come:
‘If the lesson is not learned, the curses will escalate. The final curse, as both Leviticus and Deuteronomy make clear, is national exile. Interestingly, the nations that eventually devour and scatter Israel are described in places like Psalm 80:13 and Daniel 7 as beasts. In this way, the inflicted curse in the form of these literal beasts foreshadows the beastly nations that are to come if Israel fails to repent. In 722 BC, God uses Assyria to drag the Northern Kingdom into exile.’ (Akin)
Matthew Henry comments:
‘It was his character as a prophet that they designed to abuse. The honour God had crowned him with should have been sufficient to cover his bald head and protect him from their scoffs. They bade him go up, perhaps reflecting on the assumption of Elijah: “Thy master,” they say, “has gone up; why dost not thou go up after him? Where is the fiery chariot? When shall we be rid of thee too?” These children said as they were taught; they had learned of their idolatrous parents to call foul names and give bad language, especially to prophets. These young cocks, as we say, crowed after the old ones. Perhaps their parents did at this time send them out and set them on, that, if possible, they might keep the prophet out of their town.’
These youngers:
‘were typical of a nation that “mocked God’s messengers, despised his words and scoffed at his prophets” (2 Chr 36:16).’ (NAC)
2 Chronicles 36:16 – ‘But they mocked God’s messengers, despised his warnings, and ridiculed his prophets. Finally the Lord got very angry at his people and there was no one who could prevent his judgment.’
He called God’s judgment down on them – Matthew Poole notes that this was, accordingly, done:
‘not from any carnal or revengeful passion, but by the motion of God’s Spirit and by God’s command and commission, as appears by God’s concurrence with him, which God did, partly for the terror and caution of all other idolaters and profane persons, who abounded in that place, partly to vindicate the honor and maintain the authority of his prophets, and particularly of Elisha, now especially in the beginning of his sacred ministry.’
The point of this incident (and the one recorded in 2 Kings 1:1-17) is that God, his servants and his word are to be respected even when disrespect is rife. Elijah and Elisha did not go around calling down curses on people for fun. Both saved life too (1 Kings 17; 2 Kings 4). These are exceptional incidents, reminders to people then and know that God is not to be trifled with.
We may add that this episode, occuring as it does near the beginning of Elisha’s prophetic ministry, affirms his role and status as a man of God.
Turning to the New Testament:
‘Jesus forbade his disciples to call down fire on an unwelcoming village (Luke 9:54f) and Paul stresses that vengeance is to be left to God’s own timing (Rom 12:19-21). Christians are not called to curse, but to bless; the prophets are exceptional people called to give special revelation of God’s character in specific one-off incident and utterances. But we should also note that the New Testament teaches that everyone will have to face the consequence of loose words and false deeds. Getting away with them now does not guarantee future immunity from divine prosecution.’ (The Bible Application Handbook)
Goldingay comments:
‘While Jesus would no doubt forbid his disciples to act like Elisha as he forbade them to act like Elijah, his words show that it is only temporarily that people get away with belittling Jesus. In the end they will pay with their lives.’