24:1 During Jehoiakim’s reign, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon attacked. Jehoiakim was his subject for three years, but then he rebelled against him. 24:2 The LORD sent against him Babylonian, Syrian, Moabite, and Ammonite raiding bands; he sent them to destroy Judah, as he had warned he would do through his servants the prophets. 24:3 Just as the LORD had announced, he rejected Judah because of all the sins which Manasseh had committed. 24:4 Because he killed innocent people and stained Jerusalem with their blood, the LORD was unwilling to forgive them.
The Lord was unwilling to forgive them – This statement is regarded as being in contradiction to the Bible’s wider teaching on God’s mercy willingness to forgive (see, e.g. Psa 103:3,10), and, more specifically, with 2 Chron 33:19, where it is said that Manasseh eventually repented and found forgiveness.
To quote AI generated content from Logos Bible Software:
‘These passages reflect different authorial purposes rather than a genuine contradiction. 2 Kings 24:3–4 attributes Judah’s destruction to the Lord’s determination to remove the nation because of Manasseh’s sins[1], presenting a theological explanation for the exile that emphasizes divine judgment. Kings portrays Manasseh as the worst of Judah’s kings, whose sins make the exile inevitable, while Chronicles presents him as an example of forgiveness and restoration[2].
‘The apparent tension dissolves when you recognize that these accounts operate on different theological levels. There is no record of Manasseh’s imprisonment and repentance in Kings, likely because the author does not include it since it would undermine his portrayal of Manasseh’s sins as the cause of the exile[3]. In contrast, the Chronicler records that Manasseh’s wickedness led to his deportation to Babylon, but while there he repented, humbled himself before Yahweh, and prayed for mercy, and Yahweh responded favorably and returned him to power[3].
‘Rather than contradicting each other, the two accounts emphasize complementary truths: Kings stresses that Manasseh’s sins triggered the exile as divine punishment, while Chronicles acknowledges that same sinfulness but adds that God’s mercy remained available through repentance. The Kings passage focuses on the inevitability of judgment given the measure of sin; the Chronicles passage demonstrates that even such judgment could be reversed through genuine turning to God. Both texts affirm Manasseh’s guilt; they simply highlight different aspects of God’s response to it.’
[1] Carl Friedrich Keil and Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996), 3:356.
[2] J. I. Packer, Wayne Grudem, and Ajith Fernando, eds., ESV Global Study Bible (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2012), 623.
[3] John D. Barry et al., Faithlife Study Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2016). [See here, here.]