Romans 5:18 – ‘Life for all?’
Some have taken Paul to be teaching universalism here. For Kasemann, ‘all-powerful grace is unthinkable without eschatological universalism.’
In The Lost Message of Paul (ch 19), Steve Chalke insists that, for Paul, ‘all people’ must mean ‘all people without exception’. The gift of life is co-extensive for ‘all men’ with the sentence of condemnation ‘for all men’. To interpret otherwise, he says, is not only ‘disingenuous’, but also renders Paul’s language incoherent. I think that Chalke’s summary rejection of alternative views, together with his dismissal of those who hold them as ‘disingenuous’ is irresponsible.…


