You say, ‘Eucharist’; I say, ‘Holy Communion’. You say, ‘Priest’, I say, ‘Minister’. You say, ‘Spiritual formation’, I say, ‘Discipleship’. You say, ‘Contemplative prayer’; I say, ‘Communion with God’.
Is it as simple as that? Are these just different names for the same things?
To focus the question: Is contemplative prayer compatible with (or even essential to) evangelical faith, or inimical to it? Does the contemplative life represent a departure from, or a deepening of, the evangelical life?
Definitions
I begin at the level of definition. First, I shall define what I mean by ‘evangelical’, and then explore definitions of ‘contemplative’.
What does ‘evangelical’ mean?
I write as a convinced evangelical. I fully affirm the historical creeds of the Christian church, and can briefly set out my evangelical convictions in the words of the ‘Basis of Faith’ of the Evangelical Alliance:
WE BELIEVE IN…
1. The one true God who lives eternally in three persons – the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
2. The love, grace and sovereignty of God in creating, sustaining, ruling, redeeming and judging the world.
3. The divine inspiration and supreme authority of the Old and New Testament Scriptures, which are the written Word of God-fully trustworthy for faith and conduct.
4. The dignity of all people, made male and female in God’s image to love, be holy and care for creation, yet corrupted by sin, which incurs divine wrath and judgement.
5. The incarnation of God’s eternal Son, the Lord Jesus Christ – born of the virgin Mary; truly divine and truly human, yet without sin.
6. The atoning sacrifice of Christ on the cross: dying in our place, paying the price of sin and defeating evil, so reconciling us with God.
7. The bodily resurrection of Christ, the first fruits of our resurrection; his ascension to the Father, and his reign and mediation as the only Saviour of the world.
8. The justification of sinners solely by the grace of God through faith in Christ.
9. The ministry of God the Holy Spirit, who leads us to repentance, unites us with Christ through new birth, empowers our discipleship and enables our witness.
10.The Church, the body of Christ both local and universal, the priesthood of all believers – given life by the Spirit and endowed with the Spirit’s gifts to worship God and proclaim the gospel, promoting justice and love.
11.The personal and visible return of Jesus Christ to fulfil the purposes of God, who will raise all people to judgement, bring eternal life to the redeemed and eternal condemnation to the lost, and establish a new heaven and new earth.
Much criticism can be levelled at evangelical spirituality. But this is my ‘Here I stand’. This is the benchmark by which I shall test expressions of the contemplative.
What does ‘contemplation’ mean?
I turn now to explore the meaning of ‘contemplative’.
According to the Dictionary of the Christian Church (Cross & Livingstone), ‘contemplation’, in its primary definition, means ‘to look at things, either with the eyes or with the mind’.
The Concise Oxford Dictionary recognises both general and religious meanings. Of the latter, ‘contemplation’ can mean:
‘(in Christian spirituality) a form of prayer in which a person seeks a direct experiences of the divine.’
James Wilhoit and Evan Howard (Discovering Lectio Divina) agree that communion with God lies at the heart of contemplation:
‘Contemplation [is] a resting in God and an enjoyment of the pleasure of his company.’
Richard Foster (Streams of Living Water) also regards the essence of the contemplative life as:
‘the steady gaze of the soul upon the God who loves us.’
Elsewhere, Foster states:
‘Contemplative prayer is a loving attentiveness to God.’
A similar definition is offered in the Evangelical Dictionary of Christian Education:
‘Contemplation seeks an increased openness, awareness, and love for God. It is the soul at rest with God.’
I conclude that the basic meaning of ‘contemplation’, in its Christian sense, is ‘communion with God’. With this, no evangelical can have any argument.
Is there a difference between ‘contemplation’ and ‘meditation’?
In some of the literature, ‘meditation’ and ‘contemplation’ are used interchangeably. Indeed, during the Middle Ages there was a tendency to conflate meditation, prayer and contemplation around the experience of an intense love for God.
However, a distinction is often drawn. Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross distinguished between contemplative prayer and mental prayer (meditation). In meditative prayer the natural powers of the mind and will are engaged, whereas in contemplative prayer they are suspended.
Schwanda distinguishes between them thus:
‘I understand meditation to be the active use of the mind to engage God through reading and praying of Scripture or some other devotional practices. The key is the active and intentional reflection, or ruminatio, on whatever we are considering. Contemplation is a loving attentiveness or grateful gazing on God. It is experiential and savoring rather than discursive or mental dissection. It emphasizes the heart more than the head.’
Ward (A Dictionary of Christian Spirituality) notes that in the literature of prayer contemplation is often seen as a progression from meditation. Moreover, contemplation itself is often viewed as occuring in stages, culminating in a ecstatic union with God.
According to Schwanda:
‘Thomas White, a seventeenth-century English Puritan, drew this distinction using the bridal language of the Song of Songs: “Meditation is like the kindling of fire and contemplation more like the flaming of it when fully kindled. The one is like the spouse seeking Christ, and the other like the spouse’s enjoying of Christ.’
Ward agrees that contemplation differs from meditation. In the latter,
‘the mind reflects on some Christian truth or passage of Scripture or personal experience, using words and ideas in more or less logical progression, with the aim of reaching fuller understanding and personal appropriation of the truth considered, or working through some experience in the light of Christian faith in order to come to some decision, awareness of God’s will or re-affirmation of faith.’
In contemplation, on the other hand,
‘the mind functions in the opposite way. Words and thoughts in logical progression, reflections with the aim of coming to fresh insight or decision, are exactly what the mind does not want, and indeed it finds them a hindrance. What is desired is the opportunity simply to express to God one’s loving, hoping, trusting, thanking, in as few words as possible. These few words tend to be repeated many times. The repetition has the effect of steadily reducing their meaning and serviceableness. A time comes when a deeper desire is revealed to the person praying. What began as fragmentarily verbalised loving or thanking becomes more than anything else an offering, thought without this self-giving being mentally considered or understood.’
Aquinas associated contemplation with the intellectual life, whereas others made a contrast between the two.
For many writers and practitioners, contemplative prayer does not move logically through a set of ideas. J. Neville Ward writes:
‘In its Christian use this word normally denotes the kind of prayer in which the mind does not function discursively but is arrested in a simple attention and one-pointedness.’
Meditation is more cognitive; contemplation more affective.
‘Meditation requires study, rumination, and explanation, using the mind, while contemplation depends on savoring, enjoying, and experiences of the heart. Richard of St. Victor (1111–1173) observed that “meditation investigates, contemplation wonders.”’ (Dictionary of Christian Spirituality)
When considering the relationship between meditation and contemplation, a key question is whether the first forms the basis for the second, or whether the second supercedes or transcends the first.
What are some contemplative practices?
Jesus Prayer (Eastern Orthodox)
‘The contemplator repeats continually, “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner,” until the phrase moves to the background and attention is turned undividedly to God.’ (EDCE)
Lectio divina
Guigo the Second, the 12th-century monk, formulated four elements of ‘spiritual reading’. These have been taken up by a range of teachers, including renowned evangelical J.I. Packer, who advocates a from of lectio divina (in his book, with C. Nystrom, Praying).
- Reading (lectio) – this involves close attention to the text through careful exegesis. A sentence or paragraph of Scripture is read slowly and repeatedly, perhaps with a different emphasis each time.
- Meditation (meditatio) – we enter into the text with the expectant curiosity of a child. Packer calls this ‘brooding’ over the text. We ask: what is God saying or doing? What is he asking me to do? How might my life be different in the light of this?
- Prayer (oratio) – as God speaks to us through the scriptures we speak in response to God. This might take the form of praying the passage itself or turning it into praise, petition or intercession.
- Contemplation (contemplatio) – involving a resting in God, waiting with hopeful expectancy, living out in our everyday lives what we have read.
The whole process is unhurried, and might take up to an hour.
Seen as an antidote to a sterile reading of Scripture in which no encounter with God is sought or experienced, this method has distinct merits. However, David Helm (Expositional Preaching) warns that it can rely too much on a subjective, intuitive, reading of the text (what it means to me), at the expense of a more objective exegesis of the text (what it meant to its author and original readers).
Centering prayer
According to Todd E. Johnson (DCS),
‘Centering prayer takes its name from the practice of quieting oneself and focusing on a word, repeated most often silently to oneself, as a way of focusing on God and “centering” one’s life around this encounter with God. For example, one might repeat the word “Savior” slowly and quietly, often in rhythm with your breathing. As your breathing slows and you enter into a quieter and more contemplative state, you would stop repeating the word and simply rest with your mind centered on God.’
Other practices
The Center for Action and Contemplation recognises a range of contemplative practices:
- Drumming: Practicing surrendering the mind and attuning the body through rhythm
- Walking Meditation: Taking slow, mindful steps
- Ecstatic Dance: Moving freely to music
- Chanting: Singing with intention
- Centering Prayer: Observing and letting go of all thoughts without judgment during a period of silence
- Lectio Divina: Reading short passages of text in a contemplative way
- Welcoming Prayer: Welcoming any feeling, sensation, or emotion that arises in the midst of your day
- YHWH Prayer: Consciously saying God’s name through each breath
- Pranayama: Breathing mindfully
- Loving Kindness Meditation: Recognizing your inner source of loving kindness and sending love to others
I conclude from this brief survey of contemplative practices that some are more compatible with evangelical faith than others.
Are there Christian and sub-Christian forms of contemplation?
In chapter 1 of ‘Embracing Contemplation’ (eds Coe and Strobel) John H. Coe seeks to draw a distinction between truly Christian (i.e. biblical) forms of contemplation, and those that are sub-Christian.
Sub-Christian forms of contemplation, Coe argues, have their roots in Platonic, Neoplatonic and Origenic thinking. They are often based on some form of pantheism or panentheism. They share a dualism of spirit and matter. Spirit is ‘real’, matter is illusary. Our soul’s kinship with the divine makes contemplation possible. It is in contemplation that the soul is freed from its connection with the body and is able, through various techniques, to fly upwards.
Such metaphysics, which persist in New Age and Eastern philosophies, are alien to the biblical worldview. To be specific:
- Sub-Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer is an approach to knowing “God” due to the kinship of the human soul and God as a kind of return of the divine spark in humanity to its original divinity in some pantheistic or panentheistic manner, thereby obscuring the absolute ontological distinction between the finite created human spirit and the infinite Creator Spirit of God.
- Sub-Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer is not dependent on God revealing himself but on intellectual techniques and acts of devotion to “reach” or “ascend” to know God.
- Sub-Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer rejects an orthodox view of original sin as well as the necessary work of Christ on the cross to reconcile humanity to God, but rather affirms that the chasm between God and humanity can be bridged by some kind of human soul effort.
- Sub-Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer often involves a use of silence and certain divine words or mantras to evacuate consciousness in an attempt to empty the self in order to return to its divine origin.
- In some cases, sub-Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer aims at altered states of consciousness for the sake of therapeutic euphoria or ecstasy with the divine.
(Emphasis added)
Truly Christian contemplation, on the other hand (writes Coe) is rooted in Nicene orthodoxy. This theology recognises a divide between God and humanity . Athanasius and Gregory of Nyssa reject spirit/matter dualism and affirm an absolute distinction between the Creator and his creation. We cannot know God as he is in himself, but only as he has revealed himself to us. It is not we who rise up to meet God, but he who stoops in revelation, incarnation and the indwelling Spirit to make himself know to us.
Accordingly:
- Knowledge of God cannot be attained by human effort alone but is grounded solely on God’s sovereign choice to reveal himself in creation (Rom 1:18-23), Word (2 Tim 3:16; Heb 4:12), his works and incarnation (Heb 1:1-2), and the indwelling Spirit (Rom 8:15-17; 1 Cor 2:14-16).
- Personal knowledge of God cannot be attained by human effort or spiritual activities on their own due to the pervasive and radical effects of original sin but is made possible in the atoning, finished work of Christ on the cross (Rom 3:12; 5:18-21; 6:23), which reconciles the believer to God, making relationship with and knowledge of God possible once again.
- Personal knowledge of God cannot be attained by human effort or spiritual activities on their own but is grounded in the regenerating and ongoing illuminating and vivifying ministry of the indwelling Holy Spirit, who connects us back with God (Rom 8:15-17; 1 Cor 2:14-16; Titus 3:15).
Contemplative prayer may then be described thus:
‘Contemplation (contemplative prayer) is the act and experience whereby our human spirit opens to and attends to the indwelling Spirit of Christ, who is continually revealing himself to us and bearing witness to our spirit that we are children of God, loved by God in Christ, but in such a way that this opening of our spirit is in fact due to the movement of God’s Spirit by which we even cry out to God—“Abba, Father”—in the first place.’
In contemplative prayer the believer seeks to pray in the manner set out by Paul in Ephesians:
- That we be strengthened with power in the inner person (Eph 3:16)
- That Christ may dwell in our hearts through faith (Eph 3:16)
- That we be rooted and grounded in love (Eph 3:17)
- That we come to know the extent of the love of God (Eph 3:18-19)
- That we be filled with all the fullness of God (Eph 3:19)
- That we be given a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of God (Eph 1:17)
- That we have the eyes of our heart enlightened to know our hope, the riches of his glory, and the greatness of God’s power toward us (Eph 1:18-19)
Such an approach to God in prayer is also found in the Psalms (e.g. Psa 34:8; 37:4; 37:7; 42:1f).
Contemplative prayer, then, is simply:
‘the believer’s heart adoring and loving the true triune God who now has made his abode in that human heart (Jer 31:31-35; Jn 17:20-21).’
Coe concludes:
1. Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer is not a return to a person’s own original divinity (pantheism or panentheism) but is the process by which the believer’s spirit experiences more deeply the ministry of the Holy Spirit on the basis of Christ’s redemptive work, as one is more and more filled with all the fullness of God (Eph 3:19; 5:18). This never obscures the absolute ontological distinction between the finite human spirit and the Spirit of God. Rather, this is the heart of a true Christian mysticism that is more relational in orientation and rejects pagan mysticism that is primarily ontological in nature.
2. Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer is entirely dependent on God revealing himself in order to strengthen the believer, love the believer, and so on. We pray, but it is up to God to provide what he wishes for our good (Phil 2:12-13).
3. Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer is grounded in an orthodox view of original sin requiring the work of Christ in the new covenant to reconcile humanity to God. Apart from this, the human spirit cannot experience the Spirit of God (Eph 2:5).
4. Christian contemplative prayer may involve a use of silence or Scripture, not as a way to empty the self of itself in some return to its own fanaticized divinity but rather to empty the heart of unnecessary distractions and expectations in an attempt to open the human spirit to the person and work of the Holy Spirit (Eph 1:17-19), who dwells within and in relational union with our spirit.
5. Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer does not aim at producing altered states of consciousness for the sake of therapeutic euphoria or ecstasy with the divine. Rather, it puts the human will in a place to be open to the presence, work, and will of the Spirit of God as a response to the command to be filled with or influenced by the Spirit (the force of the passive voice in Eph 5:18), regardless of the resulting feeling (consolation or dryness). God is present regardless of how we feel, so that faith (trust) and not feelings becomes our access to letting the Spirit affect us as well as our way of discerning the presence of God.
6. Christian contemplation or contemplative prayer is not the result of a technique or something engineered by our doing spiritual disciplines. Rather, it is from beginning to end a work of the Spirit of God on the human spirit by which we even cry out to God as Father in the first place (Rom 8:15) and by which we in fullness and maturity come to know the love of God by being rooted and grounded in the love of the indwelling Christ in our spirit (Eph 3:17-19). The implication of this new covenant spirituality is that we participate and interact with God, but it is he who initiates and generates religious presence, prayer, maturity, and sanctification.
I am beginning to think that if ‘contemplation’ is freighted with so many sub-Christian connotations, why use the word at all with regard to an authentically Chrstian approach? Why not call it (as so many have) ‘communion with God’?
Does contemplation represent a retreat from rational thought?
If, as many writers assert, meditation and contemplation are to be distinguished by the former utilising the rational powers of the mind, and the latter eschewing such powers, then this needs to be explored.
The Center for Action and Contemplation, founded by Fr Richard Rohr, introduces contemplation in the following way:
‘Contemplation is the practice of being fully present—in heart, mind, and body—to what is in a way that allows you to creatively respond and work toward what could be.
‘For many, contemplation is prayer or meditation, a daily practice of deep listening to better connect with ourselves and divine love. Father Richard [Rohr] teaches that contemplative prayer helps us sustain the Truth we encounter during moments of great love and great suffering long after the intensity of these experiences wears off. Contemplative prayer is the way we work out the experiences that words elude, how we learn from them and bravely allow ourselves to be transformed by them, even when our normal modes of thinking can’t make sense of them.
‘…The contemplative mind is about receiving and being present to the moment, to the now, without judgment, analysis, or critique. Contemplative “knowing” is a much more holistic, heart-centered knowing, where mind, heart, soul, and senses are open and receptive to the moment just as it is…
‘…Contemplation might be described as entering a deeper silence and letting go of our habitual thoughts, sensations, and feelings in order to connect to a truth greater than ourselves.’
(Emphasis added)
I have little doubt that Rohr would regard his approach as an advance upon rational thought and theological orthodoxy. I suspect that it is, rather, a retreat.
Richard Foster (Streams of Living Water) identifies several ‘perils’ in the Contemplative Tradition. One of these is
‘the tendency to devalue intellectual efforts to articulate our faith. This can sometimes border on (or plunge headlong into) anti-intellectualism. We can see this in the various mysticisms that are divorced from solid theology. And even completely orthodox writers in this Tradition can sometimes inadvertently contribute to this problem in their zeal to stress heart-faith.’
Ward (A Dictionary of Christian Spirituality) warns:
‘Christian contemplation needs Christian meditation, in the sense of reflection on the great Christian image which is Christ himself, his truth, and all that has been well thought and said and done in his name under the guidance of the Spirit. Without this, contemplation could eventually become a not particularly Christian exercise, not necessarily objectionable for that reason but simply a very different matter and perhaps nearer to Transcendental Meditation which seems to be associated with no system of belief, seldom leads to increased awareness of spiritual reality, and has a rather loose relation to the intellectual and emotional life of the practitioner.’
Jason Helopoulos compares Christian meditation with Eastern mysticism:
‘Christian meditation is not like meditation found in Eastern mysticism. In fact, they are so different that it is difficult to refer to them with the same title. Eastern mysticism seeks to empty the mind through meditation. Christian meditation fills the mind with truth, turning that truth over and over in the mind, allowing it to grip the heart and stir the affections.’ (Emphasis added)
This should serve as a warning to those who advocate principles and techniques of contemplation that seek to empty the mind.
According to Joel Beeke,
‘The Puritans never tired of saying that biblical meditation involves thinking on the triune God and His Word. By anchoring meditation in the living Word, Jesus Christ, and God’s written Word, the Bible, the Puritans distanced themselves from the kind of bogus spirituality or mysticism that stresses contemplation at the expense of action, and flights of the imagination at the expense of biblical content.
‘For the Puritans, meditation exercised both the mind and the heart; he who meditates approaches a subject with his intellect as well as his affections. Thomas Watson (c. 1620–1686) defined meditation as “a holy exercise of the mind whereby we bring the truths of God to remembrance, and do seriously ponder upon them and apply them to ourselves.”
‘Edmund Calamy (1600–1666) wrote, “A true meditation is when a man doth so meditate of Christ as to get his heart inflamed with the love of Christ; so meditate of the Truths of God, as to be transformed into them; and so meditate of sin as to get his heart to hate sin.”
‘Calamy went on to say that, to do good, meditation must enter three doors: the door of understanding, the door of the heart and affections, and the door of practical living. “Thou must so meditate of God as to walk as God walks; and so to meditate of Christ as to prize him, and live in obedience to him.”’
Evangelical evaluations
Wholesale rejection
In some evangelical circles, there is nothing good that can be said of contemplative prayer.
Schwanda identifies the Lighthouse Trails as the best-known critic of all things contemplative. The net is thrown wide:
‘As a response to learning that a mystical-type spirituality had entered the Christian church through many avenues, we began Lighthouse Trails. This spirituality, called contemplative spirituality or spiritual formation, was infiltrating youth groups, churches, seminaries, and Bible studies at an alarming rate through the Spiritual Formation movement, the emerging church, the Purpose Driven movement and so forth.’
The same source defines contemplative spirituality as
‘a belief system that uses ancient mystical practices to induce altered states of consciousness (the silence) and is rooted in mysticism and the occult but often wrapped in Christian terminology. The premise of contemplative spirituality is pantheistic (God is all) and panentheistic (God is in all). Common terms used for this movement are “spiritual formation,” “the silence,” “the stillness,” “ancient-wisdom,” “spiritual disciplines,” and many others.’
‘Dangerous practitioners’ include Richard Foster, Dallas Willard, Rick Warren, Tim Keller, John Ortberg, Eugene Peterson, Bruce Demarest, Larry Crabb, Beth Moore, Adele Calhoun, and Gary Thomas.
According to Lighthouse Trails, the movement is based on three false premises: a denial of the sin nature of humanity, a denial of the atonement, and a denial of God’s personal nature.
As Schwanda notes:
‘All of the above persons would quickly repudiate this threefold attack.’
For Lighthouse Trails and some other critics, there is
- a frequent distortion of of the meaning of terms such as ‘spiritual formation’ and ‘spiritual discipline’
- an underlying neglect of two thousand years of Christian thought and experience
- a deep suspicion of anything related to the Roman Catholic Church
- a lack of awareness of ‘how Protestants from the sixteenth century onward adapted Roman Catholic practices that they inherited according to their own emerging Protestant sensibilities and theology.’
A more thoughtful, but still largely dismissive, critique of contemplative prayer is found in the later work of Donald Bloesch. Following, Karl Barth, Bloesch expressed concern that contemplation would steer a person away from intercessory prayer and from active involvement in God’s kingdom and in the world.
Measured acceptance
Others, however, have given a more positive account.
Richard Lovelace, Bruce Demarest, Richard Foster, James Houston, Eugene Peterson, Robert Webber, J.I. Packer and Dallas Willard have all, in their different ways, espoused contemplative prayer.
These evangelical teachers do not accept all expressions of contemplative prayer uncritically. Schwanda writes of Richard Foster:
‘Foster devotes four pages in one of his works to the “potential perils” of contemplation, reminding readers not to isolate themselves from ordinary life, to beware of excessive asceticism, not to marginalize the intellectual dimension of faith, and not to ignore the necessity of communal life.’
Schwanda cites Bruce Demarest:
‘“The renowned Reformed scholar, John Murray, put it well: ‘There is an intelligent mysticism in the life of faith.’ Mystical spirituality in the . . . relational sense is not a dangerous distortion of Christian life and mission, but is the very essence thereof.”’
Conclusion
My conclusion is that ‘contemplation’ means too many different things to provide a useful integrating concept for authentic Christian experience.
In some hands, it expresses a vitality of spiritual experience that has characterised the best of Christian faith down the centuries. As such, it points to a deficit in some current evangelical expressions of faith that should serve as a warning and a stimulus to us all.
In some other hands, it represents a flight from biblical orthodoxy into a mysticism that eschews careful exegesis, rational thought and orthodox doctrine. I am concerned, too, that it can focus too much on techniques for prayer, neglecting the sovereignty of God in disclosing himself experientially too us (as seen, especially, in times of spiritual awakening).
I hope to turn, then, in some subsequent posts, to explore some aspects of spiritual experience, but without attempting to subsume these under the single heading of ‘contemplation’.
Joel Beeke, How Can I Practice Christian Meditation?